When printing this page, you must include the entire legal notice. This material may not be published, reproduced, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed without permission.
Writing an Article Review When writing a review of an article published in a professional journal or anthology, focus on a topic or issue that draws your attention. Recognize that most authors assume that the reader has some background knowledge, which you might not have. Still, your job is to understand the logic, structure, and essence of the material in the article.
Some articles include a summary or abstract at the beginning of the article. Most articles follow a similar structure: Usually, articles have subheadings which permit skimming.
A good trick is to read the first couple of paragraphs, then skip to the conclusions to get a feel for the author's argument.
Then go back and read in detail, noting words and issues you don't understand and noting and the main points and supporting infomation. Feel free to quote selectively from the article, especially if the author has a particularly pithy turn of phrase.
Your critical review should include in paragraph, essay form but not necessarily in this order: A title that reflects the thrust of your review. What does the reader need to know to understand the main points of the article?
Many writers do not state a clear thesis because they are not as well trained in writing as you aretherefore you may have to figure it out yourself and state it in your own words. Sometimes, there may be three or four main points, not just one.
What are the author's general conclusions? A critique is not whether you liked the article or not.
Rather, you should assess whether the the main point s is really significant? Does the author's argument support the main point s? Is the evidence convincing? Are there wider ramifications to the conclusions? Can you apply this information to subjects with which you are familiar?
Does the author employ a particular paradigm such as postmodernism or a particular theory such as ecological materialism? What don't you understand, and is this because you lack certain assumed knowledge or vocabulary or because the writer is unclear?
This list should not be considered all-inclusive nor restrictive. Journal articles vary greatly in subject, style, and methodology, so your review needs to reflect the material you are dealing with. Is Development Destroying the Third World?
The Making and Marketing of Development Anthropology. Few modern ideas in economics or international studies have engendered as much controversy as that of "development.
Arturo Escobar, an anthropologist at the University of Massachusetts in Amherst, is not satisfied merely to take potshots at one or another of these formulations nor to offer an alternative model; rather it is the very concept -- or in his term, "discourse" -- of development that needs to be attacked.
Drawing his inspiration from French philosopher Michael Foucault, Escobar argues that development policies are mechanisms for spreading Western hegemony. The dominance of this knowledge system has dictated the marginalization and disqualification of non-Western knowledge systems" p.
Typically, development has been conceived as a state-level phenomena, based on policies instituted at the level of the state. However, development anthropology, which is often equated with applied anthropology, usually focuses on the community level. According to Escobar, whatever anthropologists' good intentions might be, they cannot help but impose the discourse of the West, with its capitalist and technological solutions.
Even conceptionalizing the Third World in terms of "problems" and "issues" to be "solved" by external authorities imposes upon indigenous cultures Your name, course, assignment and date go in the upper left.
Epigraph, before title, gives a quote that sums up the author's thesis. Epigraphs can be useful in other types of papers also, and sometimes can provide key words of the title. Your title sums up your position on the article. The full reference for the article is placed in proper format after your title.
The body of your paper should be in point type and double spaced not as here.There are many different standards for how to write the title of a journal article (e.g. APA, MLA, IEEE, etc.) Journal articles will be underlined when written in MLA style.
Write the reference in such an order: last name of the author, initials, publication year, title of the article, name of the journal in italics, volume, page numbers if necessary.
In-text citations should be made using the author-date system, which means that you only need to indicate name of the author, followed by the year of publication.
How to write an effective title and abstract and choose appropriate keywords; How to write an effective title and abstract and choose appropriate keywords.
Velany Rodrigues | Nov 4, | 1,, views. Writing the empirical journal article. In MP Zanna& JM Darley. Title page: includes a running head for publication, title, and byline and affiliation. Image Caption: Sample APA title page; running head and page number in upper right-hand corner, definition of running head IN ALL CAPS, and vertically and horizontally centers the title of the paper, its author and her affiliation to the page.
General Format for Writing a Scientific Paper. You can benefit from writing good scientific papers, even if you do not expect to go on in Biology. Preparing a scientific paper develops your ability to organize ideas logically, think clearly, and express yourself accurately and concisely.
Article title. Journal title volume: pages. Then, write the name of the journal in italics and title case, a comma, volume number, a comma, page numbers and a period. The volume number should also be in .